I never, in a million years, thought I would ever read the Twilight books. I'm a voracious reader, don't get me wrong, but I'm kind of snobby about it. Actually, I'm really snobby about it. When I first started dating my now husband and I saw how many Mary Higgings Clark and James Patterson books he owned, I was aghast. Shocked! Revolted! Well, maybe not revolted, but I made it a secret mission to expose him to as many of my favorite books as possible. Gee, honey, I have no idea where that awesome Dan Brown paperback went! Here, why don't you read this lovely little Donna Tartt book instead?
It was devious, not to mention pretentious on my part, and I eventually realized the error of my ways. The man likes what he likes, and if what he likes is to curl up on the couch for a rainy weekend with a best seller from five years ago that he picked up at a rummage sale, who am I to stop him? Still, I would never succumb to the thrill of a quick, mindless read. I have Joseph Conrad and Milan Kundera running through my veins! I am a literary woman! I am - what? Twilight? Yeah, about that.
My almost thirteen year old niece started our family down that path of obsession that eventually sucked both her mother and another aunt in. Grandma is in the process of reading the books but isn't quite as gung-ho as the others.
When the movie came out, I started to see why so many women were crazy over Twilight. Edward Cullen is one sexy vampire. There's just something about Robert Pattinson's sleepy looking eyes and brooding good looks that I find attractive, despite those jack-o-lantern eyebrows of his. Seriously, can he do something about them?
British hunk or no British hunk, I was firm in my resolve not to fall into Twilighysteria. True, I had felt the same way about Harry Potter until, after I couldn't contain my curiosity anymore and asked for all seven books for Christmas, I devoured them all in a month and declared my love for them. But Harry Potter was a horse of a different color, right? I mean, it was a quick read, entertaining. It had legions of obsessed fans, so that should tell you something right there. It was a fantasy novel, but sort of Fantasy Lite. More universal than Tolkien or Piers Anthony, and it had elements that people of all ages enjoy.
Which started to sound pretty much exactly like Twilight. Soon enough, I found myself at my in-laws in the company of my aforementioned niece, who graciously offered to lend me the first two well-read installments of the four part series. I accepted, but still resisted as long as I could. In fact, we went on vacation to the mountains last week, and I didn't even bring them. Instead I finished the second half of Richard Russo's Empire Falls (great), struggled through Bernhard Schlink's snorefest The Reader, and read the entertaining (if not extremely predictable and frustrating) Physick Book of Deliverance Dane by Katherine Howe.
Come Saturday, we were home and I had nothing on my plate to read. Jeremy fell asleep on the couch during the Phillies game, and my mind turned to the books my niece had given me, snug in a shoebox in the spare bedroom. I figured I'd give it a chapter, and if it was more drivel that I could stand, I'd stop reading.
48 hours later, 9 of which I spent at work, I had torn through the first book and was almost half way through the second. Without even knowing it, I'd become sucked into the world of teenage vampire angst. The horror.
Now, I've read various articles about Twilight. I know that some feminist scholars say it's misogynistic and anti-feminist and I know that others think it's nothing more than a veil for Mormon or Christian propaganda. The books definitely have some religious undertones- sacrifice, redemption, and betrayal, but none of these seem to strike a chord as much as the book's rather obvious moral message: abstinence.
Edward the Vampire and Bella the mere mortal don't do the deed- at least not for a couple books(they do in later novels, once they're married, from what I understand.) The author, Stephenie Meyer, wrote the tale in such a way that the passion between Edward and Bella is sometimes palpable, but although he secretly spends the night holding her while she sleeps, they never do anything more than kiss, and even then just barely. The idea is that the brute force of Edward's vampiric love making could hurt, or even kill Bella. Is that an allegory for the soul-blackening consequences of pre-marital, teenage sex from a Mormon/Christian conservative standpoint? Maybe. But let's not forget that the target audience of Twilight are teenaged girls. Is abstinence really the worst subliminal message we can be pumping into that age group?
Don't get me wrong, I cringed every time the book went out of its way to mention Bella changing into her pajamas safely in her bathroom and out of Edward's gaze (we get it already! No humping!) and every time a paragraph explicitly drew out the electricity between E & B as they brushed cheeks or traced the outlines of each others mouths with the tips of their fingers, I secretly thought to myself GET IT ON ALREADY! But that's just me. **Edit: Just me and the hundreds of other people who've loaded the internet with dirty Twilight FanFiction, apparently.**
Is Twilight anti-feminist? I don't think so. I think there are a lot of strong female characters in the book, and even though you could argue that Bella fulfills the "typical" female role (cooks for and takes care of her father, remains utterly helpless in nearly every situation and needs constant rescuing, pines over a guy who toyed with her, admitted he was dangerous to her, and then abandoned her, etc.) she also refuses to go with the crowd of her peers and settle for nice, predictable guys like Mike Newton. She doesn't care about prom, isn't into gossip, and drives a beat ass old truck, not to mention her little stint with the motorcycle.
I love cooking, I'm anal retentive about cleaning and decorating my house, pined like crazy over my first teenage love, and *gasp* I even find a certain amount of machismo to be sexy. I can assure you that I'm not anti-feminist either. I have a lot of faith in the upcoming generation of women readers. I don't know of anyone who converted to Mormonism or wasted away their youth trying to find an unobtainable, perfect love after reading the Twilight series. I think the notion that teenage girls, en masse, would get so swept away by a book that they'd allow themselves to be in a controlling or hurtful relationship is the sort of anti-feminist notion that detractors claim to rally against. Let's give these ladies some credit, shall we?
I guess it goes without saying that I'm enjoying reading the books. I put the movie at the top of my Netflix queue (jack-o-lantern eyebrows be damned, I'm ready for an hour and a half of Robert Pattinson's face, if nothing else), and I'll happily admit that I was wrong about the way I was looking at literature. Stephenie Meyer is no wordsmith, but what she lacks in writing style she makes up for in entertainment value. Sometimes that's all we really need out of a book in the first place.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go read the shit out of New Moon. I mean, uhm, something really cerebral from a back issue of McSweeny's. Yeah, that. Cough.
9 hours ago






